New Age Medicine: Did Jesus Teach Iridology?
Rick Branch
Jesus said, The light of the
body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body
shall be full of light.
But if thine eye be evil, thy whole body shall be full of
darkness. If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how
great is that darkness! (Matthew 6:22-23).
In a parallel passage He explained, The light of the body is
the eye: therefore when thine eye is single, thy whole body also is
full of light; but when thine eye is evil, thy body also is full of
darkness.
Take heed therefore that the light which is in thee be not
darkness (Luke 11:34-35).
These two passages are often used by Christians who wish to
participate in the unbiblical practice of Iridology as being proof
that the Bible endorses the major
premises of Iridology.
However, did Jesus really teach
Iridology? Is this the correct understanding of these two
passages?
As with most passages in the Bible, when pulled from their context
of the chapter and book, nearly any passage can be twisted to teach
anything, hence the reason for the thousands of cults in the world today.
However, when left in the original context and understood from
that perspective, these passages have no connection with the New Age practice of Iridology.
Matthew 6:22
The context for the Matthew passage begins in verse 19 and ends
at verse 34. The instructions are for Christians to place their
eyes on the work of the Lord. Christians are not to worry about
what will happen in this earthly life but rather to place
treasures in heaven.
Iridologists explain that since verse 22 speaks of the eye as
being the light and single that this means clear and
healthy. However, as one of the greatest Greek scholars to ever
live has explained, it means something very different.
Dr. A.T. Robertson has stated, Here and in Luke 11:34 the eye
is called `single' in a moral sense (Word Pictures In
The New Testament, Vol. 1, p. 56, emphasis mine).
The context makes it very clear that the Christian is to be of one mind,
not serving two masters and thereby defiling themselves with
things of darkness.
Luke 11:34
Concerning the Luke passage, it too, has a context far removed
from any New Age Iridology
teaching. Beginning in verse 29 and ending in verse 36, its context
discusses the resurrection of Jesus
which will bring light into the world.
In regards to this passage, I. Howard Marshall, Senior Lecturer
in New Testament Exegesis at the University of Aberdeen, Scotland,
has several very interesting insights.
He writes, Jesus is like a light
which illuminates those who enter a house. There is nothing hidden
about this light. Any lack of illumination is due to the recipient:
if he has a sound eye, the light will enter his whole being, but if
his eye is evil, no light will enter.
Let Jesus' hearers, then, beware
lest the light they think they have within them is really
darkness. The light is not a reflective disorder from
within the body shining outward through the eye as Iridologists
would teach. Rather, it is the teachings of Jesus, it is the light
of the Gospel, being drawn into the life of the Christian.
Marshall continues in his discussion of Luke 11:34 by
explaining, Here it is stated that light is given to the body by
the eye which acts as a lamp to the interior in the sense that
light enters the body by it; the eye is thought of as receiving
light from outside the body.
The saying is not to be understood with crass literalness,
since `body' can mean the personality as a whole, especially in the
phrase `the whole body' in Aramaic. It also cannot be taken in
the strictest literal sense for to do so would be to forever bar
the blind from seeing the Light of the world.
Marshall further states, If the eye is healthy and lets in
light, i.e. if the person is single-mindedly receptive to the light
of the gospel, then his whole being will be filled with light.
In summarizing the words of Jesus in verse 35, Marshall
concludes with this admonition. The hearers are bidden to examine
whether what they think to be light is really darkness (New
International Greek Testament Commentary: Commentary on Luke,
pp. 487 & 489).
This indeed, is good advice for Christians who have become
involved in teaching or participating in the New Age practice of Iridology.
Light Goes In Not Out!
Finally, setting aside any contextual or grammatical
interpretation, just the words of Jesus by themselves refute the very
premise upon which Iridology is based.
That is, that the eye displays the physical well-being of the
body. Or as some have said, the eye is the mirror for the body.
However, Jesus said, The light of the body is the eye. In other
words, the light comes into the body through the eye. The
light of the eye is not the body. (See Iridology: Body's
Television elsewhere in this issue for details on the
physiological connection between the eye and the body).
Iridologists twist these verses causing them to say the exact
opposite of what Jesus is actually
saying.
Thus, Iridology is both unbiblical and many who practice it have
unfortunately and perhaps unknowingly fallen into the same
twisting techniques that have been used by numerous other
non-biblical groups throughout the centuries (2 Peter 3:16).
|