Santeria Loses Court Battle
John Whaley
In a recent issue of the Expositor Florida Report, an
unusual court case was reported between Santeria, a blend of
Catholicism and an African religion, and the city of Hialeah
concerning Santeria's right to sacrifice animals. The court was asked to decide whether Santeria's ritualistic
slaughter of animals was protected by the U.S. Constitution,
a practice banned by the city of Hialeah. On Thursday, October 5, a federal judge upheld the city of Hialeah's
ban on animal sacrifices, "saying the Constitution protects
only the Santeria religion's beliefs, not its practices,"
(Orlando Sentinel, 10/6/89, Sec. B, p. 3).
According to U.S. District Judge Eugene P. Spellman, "the
ordinances are not targeted at the Church of the Lukumi Babalu
Aye practitioners of Santeria but are meant to prohibit all
animal sacrifice, whether it be practiced by an individual
or a religion or a cult," (Sec. B, p. 3). Maurice Rosen, Santeria's legal representative said he "was
disappointed and would appeal all the way to the U.S. Supreme
Court if necessary." Robyn Blumner, head of the American Civil Liberties Union in
Florida said "Santeria's beliefs and practices cannot be
separated," (Ibid). The judge agreed with the city of Hialeah that its ordinances
banning the practice of animal sacrifices fulfilled a public
purpose and was not intended to regulate a controversial religion
like Santeria.
|